‘Been thinking about UK Government’s Propaganda … oops, Public Information and Ministerial broadcasts recently. No! It is HMG Propaganda, which appears at times to be out and out brainwashing – ie the concept that our minds can be altered or controlled by certain psychological techniques. It reduces our ability to think critically or independently, to allow the introduction of new, unwanted thoughts and ideas into our minds, as well as, ultimately changing our attitudes, values and belief-systems. Brainwashing? Yes! It is brainwashing.

But more frightening is comparing FEARISM and FEARISTS with Terrorism and Terrorists. A terrorist campaign has three main goals: 1 The Body Count. 2 Disrupting normal day-to-day social behaviour. 3 Spreading Fear, and then spreading more-and-more fear, in society.

Body Count? HMG’s and UK MEDIA C19 obsession is a different kind of ‘body count’ – which highlights the number of C19 daily cases and especially the number of daily deaths. Macabre? Surely not! Macabre -‘disturbing because concerned with or causing a fear of death.’ Yes! Macabre.

Societal disruption? I don’t think we need add much more under this heading.

Spreading Fear? HMG and its vassal MEDIA would never deliberately spread fear among its citizens.2022 is the 20th anniversary of when Saddam Hussein could launch biological and chemical weapons on the UK, within 45 minutes of receiving orders. Those famous W.M.D’s or Weapons of Mass Destruction.

By today we have our very own home-grown W.M.D’s – now called W.D.M’s , used to WILFULLY DECEIVE the MASSES about C19.

Such weapons, of course, would never be used against our children. No ‘Grown-up’ would put them through anything like that.

Our home grown FEARISTS obsessed with our ‘bodies’ and the daily danger to those bodies, are now ready to celebrate that obsession by vaccinating the healthy bodies and of our children.

I thought we were meant to protect the most vulnerable members of our society? Sad to say, even our children have now become political and pharmaceutical fodder.

On 7 January 2022, I came across this, in ‘HORIZON: The EU Research & Innovation Magazine’ (1 April 2020 edition), an article about the mRNA vaccines – first developed to fight cancer in humans, by the way.

It stressed the fact that only NOW (less than two years ago) are these vaccines beginning to be tested in humans, and that there are a lot of fairly basic unknowns which can only be answered through human trials. The following professor of microbiology – Professor Isabelle Bekeredjian-Ding –  was quoted many times in the piece.

Prof Isabelle is Chair of the IMI (Innovative Medicines Initiative) Scientific Committee, Head of Microbiology at Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Langen, Germany.

Prof Isabelle’s fields of expertise are: Immunology of infection & host-pathogen interaction. Clinical microbiology and infectious disease. Pharmaceutical microbiology. Regulation of vaccines and biomedicines.

In relation to our innate immune response system, as humans, to the mRNA vaccine, Prof Isabelle said, less than two years ago:

1 “There is still a lot of work to be done to understand this response, the length of the protection it could give and whether there are any downsides.”

2 “What is really the current challenge, I think, is to understand whether these vaccines will really be able to mount a sufficiently protective immune response in the human and to understand, for example, which quantities of mRNA will be needed to do this.”

Prof Isabelle also stated that the mRNA is ‘easier and faster to produce” (than traditional vaccines) and is a “very unique way of making a vaccine and, so far, no such vaccine has been licenced for infectious disease.”

Just eight months after Isabelle’s comments, on the 8 December 2020, 90-year-old Margaret Keenan received the first Covid 19 vaccine in the UK – the trials were underway, although there was no mention of them being trials, because legally they were not trials!

In the USA, the vaccine was approved for emergency use, while in the UK, the government’s independent expert scientific advisory body, known as the Commission on Human Medicines, had been carrying out a ‘rigorous, scientific and detailed (rolling) review of all available data’ since October 2020 ie only two months before Margaret received her vaccine.

Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). Chief Executive, Dr June Raine said: The public’s safety has always been at the forefront of our minds – safety is our watchword. I’m really pleased to say that the UK is now one step closer (remember, she said this, two months before the vaccine went public) to providing a safe and effective vaccine to help in the fight against COVID-19.

My question is: when will we see the results of the safety and effectiveness of the C19 vaccines. Soon?

I ASSUME THAT WE ARE ANOTHER ‘STEP CLOSER’ BY NOW?

Alice Kremelberg – just into her thirties – was sensational. If Benedict Timothy Carlton Cumberbatch CBE gets an award nomination for acting in ‘The Power of the Dog’ (Why? I have no idea!), then, whoever hands them out for a TV series should be showering Alice with them.

Trapped in a violent, controlling relationship with a wealthy and brilliant scientist, Cecilia Kass (Elizabeth Moss) escapes in the dead of night and disappears into hiding … As a series of coincidences turn lethal, Cecilia works to prove that she is being hunted by someone nobody can see. Well worth watching – excellent and entertaining. An original take on the iconic invisible one. I liked the nod to the bandaged version in the hospital scene. Elizabeth Moss is absolutely superb in the role (though I’m not a H.T. fan, book or series). She’s a real talent.

On 1 April 2020, ‘HORIZON: The EU Research & Innovation Magazine’ carried an article about the mRNA vaccines – first developed to fight cancer in humans, by the way.

It stressed the fact that only now (less than two years ago) are these vaccines beginning to be tested in humans, and that there are a lot of fairly basic unknowns which can only be answered through human trials. The following professor of microbiology was quoted many times in the piece:

Professor Isabelle Bekeredjian-Ding –

Chair of the IMI (Innovative Medicines Initiative) Scientific Committee

Head of Microbiology at Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Langen, Germany

Fields of expertise

§ Immunology of infection & host-pathogen interaction

§ Clinical microbiology and infectious disease

§ Pharmaceutical microbiology

§ Regulation of vaccines and biomedicines

In relation to our innate immune response system, as humans, to the mRNA vaccine, Prof Isabelle said, twenty-one months ago:

1

“There is still a lot of work to be done to understand this response, the length of the protection it could give and whether there are any downsides.”

II

“What is really the current challenge, I think, is to understand whether these vaccines will really be able to mount a sufficiently protective immune response in the human and to understand, for example, which quantities of mRNA will be needed to do this.”

Prof Isabelle also stated that the mRNA is ‘easier and faster to produce” (than traditional vaccines) and is a “very unique way of making a vaccine and, so far, no such vaccine has been licenced for infectious disease.”